Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, PRATEEK JALAN
Distress Management Collective – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. public interest litigation concerning healthcare protections. (Para 1) |
| 2. affidavits filed by respondents. (Para 2) |
| 3. petitioner's grievances about healthcare workers. (Para 3) |
| 4. court's observations on healthcare worker safety. (Para 4) |
| 5. discussion on suggestions for healthcare worker protection. (Para 5) |
| 6. response to recommendation for helpline. (Para 6) |
| 7. need for dedicated helpline considered. (Para 7) |
| 8. direction for appointment of nodal officers. (Para 8) |
| 9. office order for ppe equipment provision discussed. (Para 9) |
| 10. discussion on ex-gratia payment for covid-related deaths. (Para 10) |
| 11. consideration of policy for ex-gratia payments. (Para 11) |
| 12. guidance on quarantine measures for healthcare workers. (Para 12) |
| 13. insurance scheme limitations discussed. (Para 13) |
| 14. court's rationale on insurance coverage policy. (Para 14) |
| 15. opportunity for extending insurance coverage. (Para 15) |
| 16. monitoring of compliance with orders emphasized. (Para 16) |
| 17. case disposed with observations. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral) Proceedings of the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
