SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Narender Singh – Appellant
Versus
V.V. Pankajakshan – Respondent


Table of Content
1. disqualification criteria for bod elections (Para 1 , 4 , 6 , 10 , 16)
2. sections of mscs act regarding meetings (Para 7 , 8)
3. scope of interference with arbitral awards (Para 11 , 13 , 15)
4. court's interpretation of arbitral awards (Para 12 , 14)
5. dismissal of petition (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

(Video-Conferencing)

C. Hari Shankar, J.

I.A. 6324/2020

Subject to notarized affidavit being filed and deficient court fees being paid within 72 hours of resumption of normal court work, exemption, as sought, is granted for the present.

The application stands allowed accordingly.

I.A. 6325/2020

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.

O.M.P. 4/2020

1. The dispute, in the present case, relates to the election of representatives to the Board of Directors (BOD) of National Labour Cooperative Federation of India Limited (NLCFIL). The respondents had challenged the election of various persons to the BOD, on the ground, inter alia, they were violative of the provisions of the Multi - State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "the MSCS Act") and Multi-State Cooperative Societies Rules, 2002.

2. The dispute was re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top