Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, PRATEEK JALAN
Dish TV India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition details and nature of appeals (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. mandatory pre-deposit provisions in customs act (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. constitutional validity of pre-deposit clauses (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. assessment of petitioner’s financial capability (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. dismissal of writ petition (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)--Proceedings of the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
2. This writ petition has been preferred with the following prayers:
"1) Issue a writ and/or order and/or a direction including a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to entertain the appeals filed by the Petitioner by dispensing with the Petitioner requiring to deposit a further amount of INR 3,23,53,823/- being the balance of 7.5% of the assessed duty under Section 129 A of the CUSTOMS ACT , 1962, in regard to the appeal against Order-in-Original No. No. 02/VKP(02) ADG (Adj.)/DRI/N.Delhi/2020-21 dated 28.04.2020, passed by Respondent No. 3
And/or
2) Issue a writ and/or order and/or a direction including a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing that the amount totaling To INR 16,00,00,000/- deposited by the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
