SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
S.RAVINDRA BHAT, A.K.CHAWLA
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
Prime Engineers Consultants – Respondent


ORDER

S. Ravindra Bhat, J. (Oral)--In both these appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred as the "Act"), the Punjab National Bank (hereinafter referred as "PNB") questions the decision of the learned Single Judge/adjudicating its objections to two separate awards, rendered by one common Tribunal. The Tribunal adjudicated the disputes with respect to two works contracts awarded by PNB - first related to the Office premises (in Branch Office) and the other Staff Quarters.

2. The disputes, which were the subject matter of arbitration proceedings before the Tribunal, were contracts entered into on 19.05.1994. The respondent (hereinafter called the "Contractor"), which was entrusted with the execution of works, demanded various amounts as due and payable by PNB, later disputed its liability and primarily contended - in the arbitration proceedings, that some of the claims were barred on account of the Clause 5.46 since they fall in the category of "excepted matters". With respect to the other claims, various other objections were raised. The Tribunal adjudicated all these and granted different amounts to the Contractor (Rs.31 lakhs in respect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top