SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Rakesh Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Jai Gupta – Respondent


ORDER (Oral)

Anu Malhotra, J. Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 24.04.2018 of the ADJ-05, South, Saket, New Delhi in CS No. 9190/16 whereby an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed by the applicant herein as defendant thereof was declined, it having been observed inter alia to the effect that for deciding the said application in the CS No. 9190/16, the plaintiff has specifically averred that the allegations made against him are defamatory per se. It was also observed vide the said impugned order that the plaint disclosed a cause of action on the basis of contents therein and that it was to be proved by the defendant i.e. the applicant/petitioner during the trial that the plaint did not give rise to a cause of action and that the plaint could not be summarily rejected.

2. Copy of the petition that has been filed by the respondent to the present petition to whom so far no notice has been issued the said suit filed by the respondents to the present petition, arrayed as the plaintiff, to the suit in CS No. 9190/16 indicates that itself seeks damages of Rs.20 lakhs along with future interest @ 12% per annum apart from costs.

3. Accord

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top