Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Anuj @ Gunga – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's allegations of police misconduct (Para 1 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the charges (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 11) |
| 3. judicial analysis of medical evidence and its implications (Para 12 , 13 , 15 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. interpretation of 'colour of duty' in legal context (Para 16 , 17 , 29) |
| 5. protection under section 197 and sanction requirement (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. final decision to dismiss petition (Para 33) |
ORDER
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to set aside the impugned order dated 03.10.2013 passed by the Ld. A.S.J. in Crl. Revision No. 75/2012 titled as "Jai Prakash & Ors. Vs. State & Anr." vide which the Ld. A.S.J. held that the order of the framing notice U/s 341/323 IPC was without any merits and allowed the said Crl. revision filed by the revisionists (respondent Nos. 2 to 4 herein) by setting aside the impugned order dated 30.08.2012 passed by the Ld. MM and discharged the revisionists who are respondent Nos. 2 to 4 herein. The petitioner has further prayed to uphold the orders dated 30.08.2012 passed by the Ld. Trial Court in criminal complaint case No. 407a/12/05 titled as "Anuj @ Gunga V
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
