Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Sonu @ Raja – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details and background (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant's grounds for appeal (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. state's counterarguments (Para 5 , 10) |
| 4. witness accounts of incident (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. defence witness testimony and credibility (Para 11 , 12 , 20) |
| 6. cross-examination discrepancies (Para 14 , 18) |
| 7. firearm definition and interpretation (Para 22 , 25) |
| 8. definition of deadly weapon under ipc (Para 29 , 31) |
| 9. ruling on armed robbery charges (Para 36 , 38) |
| 10. conclusion of judgment appeal (Para 40) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment dated 15.03.2016 passed by the ASJ, FTC, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, whereby the appellant was convicted of the offences punishable under Sections 393 /398 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (IPC) and Sections 25 /27 of the ARMS ACT , 1959 ( ARMS ACT ). The appellant further impugns an order on sentence dated 19.03.2016, whereby he was sentenced to: (i) seven years of rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month for committing an offence punishable under Section 393 of the IPC
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
