SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Anil Rathi – Appellant
Versus
Shri Sharma Steeltech (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. At the outset, I may state that since the facts and the submissions made by the counsels in I.A. 16991/2019 in CS(COMM) 654/2019 as well as in I.A. 16994/2019 in CS (COMM) 655/2019 are similar, these applications are being disposed of by this common order. However, the facts in the aforesaid applications/suits shall be narrated separately.

I.A. 16991/2019 in CS (COMM) 654/2019 (filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC)

1. The present application has been filed with the following prayers:

    i. Pass an ex-parte ad interim injunction restraining the Defendant Nos. 1-6 their directors, executives, partners, proprietors, as the case may be, their officers, servants and agents or anyone acting for and on their behalf from manufacturing, exporting, marketing, offering for sale, selling, advertising or in any manner dealing in TMT Bars, Steel bars, common metals and their alloys; metal building materials; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; ironmongery, small items of metal hardware; pipes and tubes of metal; safes; goods of common met


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top