Justice for All vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, SANJEEV NARULA
Justice for All – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent

Table of Content
1. impact of covid-19 on educational inequality. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. introduction of petitions for educational aids for ews students. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. arguments for the right to free education under article 21a. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. challenges and statutory interpretation of rte act. (Para 12 , 18 , 21)
5. flexibility in applying statutory obligations amidst changing scenarios. (Para 13 , 14 , 17)
6. dynamic interpretation of legislative provisions. (Para 94 , 95 , 101)
7. cross-examination of legal obligations in educational inequities. (Para 144 , 145 , 148)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. It has been wisely said "education is the passport to the future". But what if some passports are better than others, giving the holder access to a better mode and method of education and in turn, a more prosperous future.

2. Inequality in education has been around long before Covid-19, but the pandemic has exacerbated the same by adding another strand/element to it, namely, digital divide.

3. The unparalleled education disruption from the Covid-19 pandemic is far from over, as despite lapse of nearly six months, Union of India and Government of NCT of Delhi (for short "GNCTD") are y

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMANMOHAN, SANJEEV NARULAJustice for All – AppellantVersusGovt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, SANJEEV NARULA
Justice for All – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent