Anil @ Sunil @ Senior vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Anil @ Sunil @ Senior – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. conviction and sentence details of the appellant. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments concerning identification and recovery issues. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. analysis of witnesses' testimonies and identification validity. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
4. final dismissal of appeal and confirmation of trial court's judgment. (Para 45 , 46)

JUDGMENT

1. The present appeal is preferred under Section 374(2) read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant Anil @ Sunil @ Senior challenging the judgment on conviction dated 29.08.2019 and order on sentence dated 31.08.2019 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, North District, Rohini Courts, New Delhi in SC No. 58293/2016 arising out of FIR No. 226/2008 registered under Sections 392 /397/411/34 IPC at Police Station Rohini, Delhi whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 392 /34 IPC read with Section 397 IPC. Further, vide order on sentence dated 31.08.2019, the appellant was directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years along with payment of fine of Rs.20,000/- in default whereof, to undergo Sim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMANOJ KUMAR OHRIAnil @ Sunil @ Senior – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Anil @ Sunil @ Senior – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent