Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Mohit Dahiya – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Pollution Control Committee – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of trainee appointment. (Para 3) |
| 2. petitioner's argument against replacement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner's qualifications and request for extension. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 4. respondent's claims regarding policy and nature of engagement. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. petitioner's counterarguments on policy. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. court's hearing of arguments. (Para 14) |
| 7. court's analysis of contractual nature of trainee role. (Para 15 , 17) |
| 8. legal rulings on temporary employment policies. (Para 19 , 21) |
| 9. final decision and dismissal of petition. (Para 22 , 24) |
JUDGMENT
1. Present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondent to continue the Petitioner on contractual basis as Trainee Engineer and not replace him with a similarly situated contractual employee.
2. Court is once again faced with the legal issue of replacement of one contractual employee with another contractual employee in the present case, which has come up time and again before the Courts and in my view the law on this is well settled.
3. The brief facts which need to be mentioned can be encapsulated as under:
a. Petitioner herein is a Post Graduate with M.Sc. in Environmental Science, a De
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
