SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Monika Hurt – Appellant
Versus
Smita Arora – Respondent


ORDER

1. This suit came up first before this Court on 2nd November, 2018, order of which date records that the plaint in the suit as filed was incomprehensible and seemed to be copy pasted from some other document. Listing of the suit itself was subject to office objection as to valuation and deficiency in court fees. On request of the counsel for the plaintiff that an opportunity be given for filing a fresh plaint, the suit was adjourned to today.

2. Today, the counsel for the plaintiff states that he has filed a fresh plaint dated 16th November, 2018.

3. The same is taken on record and has been perused.

4. The plaintiff, in the plaint has sought the following reliefs:

    "(a) Grant a decree for declaration that the Will dated 23.02.90, executed by Late Sh. R.P. Arora, in favour of daughters Ms. Raksha Arora (Late) & Ms. Sneh Prabha and brother Kanwal Kishore Manchanda, is null and void and of no effect and also incompetent;

    (b) Declare that Plaintiff and Defendants nos.5&6, are entitled to maintain the existing mutation in the records of the DDA of their share of the residential house at Tagore Garden; and to get mutated their 40% share of the factory at Mayapuri;

    (c) Decree

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top