SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
State – Appellant
Versus
Jaideep – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, J. Acquittal of respondents recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-02/Fast Track Court, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts vide its order dated 06.04.2018 passed in Sessions Case No. 174/2013 arising out of FIR No. 71/2005 under Sections 364-A/120-B of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as "IPC") and 25 of the Arms Act, has led to the filing of the present criminal leave petition.

Facts of the case

2. The case of the prosecution in a nutshell is that on 25.02.2005 PW-3 Rajender Kumar Sharma, father of the victim-1 reported in Police Station that his son PW-1 Rahul Sharma (Victim-1) residing with his family in 12-A, Ist Floor, Underhill Lane, Civil Lines, Delhi had left for his shop at Chawri Bazar with his driver PW-2 Zakir (Victim-2) in Lancer Car No. DL 1CG 7555 magic black colour. At about 3:30 p.m., his wife called him on his mobile number but failed to contact him, thereafter, she made another call to PW-2 on his mobile number who informed her that PW-1 is inside the shop. Later again she tried to contact PW-1 as well as PW-2 but failed to establish any contact with them.

3. At about 5:30 p.m., PW-3 received a r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top