SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Gulam Jilani @ Kallu – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The appellants have filed these appeals impugning a judgment dated 24.05.2017 passed by the learned ASJ-04, Rohini Courts, whereby they were convicted for committing an offence punishable under Sections 392 /34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (hereinafter `IPC'). The appellants also impugn an order on sentence dated 27.05.2017, whereby they were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years along with a fine of Rs.3,000 each and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months.

2. The appellants were charged with committing offences punishable under Sections 392 /411/34 of the IPC. In addition, Sandeep (the appellant in Crl. A. 620/2017) was also charged with committing an offence punishable under Section 397 of the IPC. The Trial Court acquitted the appellants of all charges, other than the charge of committing an offence punishable under Section 392 of the IPC, as the court did not believe that the prosecution had established that the goods recovered from the appellants were those that were stolen. Further, the complainant (who was also the eyewitness) resiled from his earlier statement

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top