SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Nilima Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Kumar Shrivastava – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff claims partition of inherited property. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. legal analysis of partition claims and owners. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. citing precedent cases on partition law. (Para 13)
4. court finds suit for partition misconceived. (Para 14 , 15 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

IA No.1375/2020 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

CS(OS) 37/2020 & IA No.1373/2020 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 1374/2020 (u/S 151 CPC)

3. The plaintiff has sued her two brothers and a sister and the heirs of another brother since deceased, for partition of property No.14, Palam Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi.

4. It is the case of the plaintiff, (i) that the property was owned by the parents of the plaintiff; (ii) that the father of the plaintiff died on 21st January, 1992, leaving a Will whereunder his share in the property was bequeathed in favour of the mother of the plaintiff; (iii) that on demise of the father of the plaintiff, the mother of the plaintiff became the sole owner of the entire property and the leasehold rights in the land underneath the property were mutated in favour of the mother of the plaintiff alone; (iv)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top