Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, TALWANT SINGH
South Delhi Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing conducted via video conferencing due to pandemic. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. writ petition challenging sdmc's termination of contract. (Para 3) |
| 3. details of contract terms and its implications. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments regarding contract violation and defaults. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. submission details from sdmc and counter-arguments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. court's observations on force majeure and its relevance. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. determining effect of force majeure on obligations. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. analysis of financial obligations under force majeure. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 9. final judgments on payments and enforcement. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 10. decisions on enforcement mechanisms and future actions. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 11. final disposal and directions for prompt hearing. (Para 30) |
JUDGMENT
Talwant Singh, J.(Via video conferencing)--The present matter has been taken up for hearing by way of Video Conferencing on account of COVID-19 pandemic.
2. By this common order, we are adjudicating LPA No. 165/2020 titled as South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd. and LPA No.167/2020 titled as MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd. v. Sout
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
