Rajesh Kumar vs Mehrotra Impex Pvt. Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Mehrotra Impex Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent

Table of Content
1. debt recognition and refusal to pay existing liability. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. conviction under n.i. act despite willingness to pay. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14)
3. court's observations on payment defaults and proceedings. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
4. circumstances for no relief under section 482. (Para 22 , 23)
5. presumption of cheque liability in n.i. act. (Para 24 , 25 , 27 , 30)
6. dismissal of petition due to lack of merit. (Para 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT

1. Present petition has been filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying as under:

i. Call the Trial Court Records of CT case No.619030/2016 (CNR-DLSE020002882011) decided by Ms.Vasundhra Azad, learned MM-03, South East District, Saket Courts as well as execution petition no.617/2017 (CNR-DLWT010054062017) pending before Shree Vikash Dhull, learned ADJ-01/West District/Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi;

ii. Issue an order thereby all the pending/decided matters between the parties may be clubbed together so as a common compounding order.

iii. Issue an order thereby directing the petitioner to pay to the respondent the judicious/reasonable amount within certain period of time keeping in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSURESH KUMAR KAITRajesh Kumar – AppellantVersusMehrotra Impex Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Mehrotra Impex Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent