SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Mahesh Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The applicant vide the present petition seeks the grant of regular bail in relation to FIR No. 192/2017, Police Station Crime Branch, Daryaganj, registered under Sections 22 /29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. It has been submitted on behalf of the applicant by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case with the allegations levelled against the application of the alleged recovery of 20 gms of MDMA (a psychotropic substance) at the apartment adjacent to Raman Apartments where the applicant resides are wholly erroneous and false.

2. Notice of the application was served to the State and accepted on behalf of the State.

3. The prosecution version as set forth through the status reports that have been submitted by the State dated 16.3.2020, 18.6.2020, 14.8.2020 and 20.8.2020 states to the effect that on 29.10.2017, ASI Pawan Kumar of the Narcotics Cell, Crime Branch received a secret information that a person named Kamal Kalra, the co-accused in the FIR, a resident of Rohini, Delhi was involved in the sale and supply of Ecstacy (a party drug) in the area of Delhi & NCR and the informer revealed that Kamal K

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top