SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Nafees Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's family circumstances regarding autism. (Para 1)
2. respondent's justification for transfer decision. (Para 2)
3. limited court interference in transfer matters. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
4. petition dismissed. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present petition has been filed by the Petitioner assailing the Transfer Order dated 24.11.2020 whereby he has been transferred to Visakhapatnam. The principal contention of the Petitioner is that his son is suffering from autism and is under treatment with the doctors at Delhi and it would not be advisable to transfer the Petitioner at the stage. It is also contended by counsel for the Petitioner that it is the Policy of the Government that employees whose dependent is suffering from such like diseases should not be subjected to routine transfers. Additionally, it is contended that the Petitioner was transferred to Delhi earlier on account of his son's ill health whereby he had lost five years of his seniority and thus the Transfer Order be quashed.

2. Mr. Tushar Mehta learned Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2 submits that Petitioner is required to join at Visakhapatnam as his Tran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top