SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
HIMA KOHLI
Sushil Kumar Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
General Manager, Northern Railway – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant/plaintiff is aggrieved by the judgment dated 04.02.2015 passed by the learned trial court, dismissing his suit for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction instituted against the respondents/Northern Railways on the ground that the same is not maintainable in view of non-compliance of Section 80 CPC and under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC on the ground that the plaint does not disclose a cause of action.

2. After addressing arguments at some length, learned counsel for the appellant states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal while reserving the right of the appellant to pursue an application submitted by him to the respondent No.1, for invoking the arbitration clause governing the parties.

3. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The appeal is disposed of. Liberty is granted to the appellant to pursue his application invoking the arbitration clause governing the parties, stated to be pending with the respondent No.1/Northern Railways, before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top