SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Satbir – Appellant
Versus
Archaeological Survey of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's prayer for investigation and intervention. (Para 1)
2. allegations of unauthorized construction. (Para 2)
3. court's directive for compliance with law. (Para 3)
4. writ petition concluded. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)

Proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers:

    "a. Direct a thorough court-monitored investigation by SIT or by the CBI into the rampant illegal/unauthorized construction at the protected monument i.e. Tughlakabad fort.

    b. Direct the respondent no. 1 to 5 to initiate action against the respondent nos. 6 and 7 for such encroachment, under the supervision of this Hon'ble Court.

    c. Direct the concerned Police Station i.e. Police Station Govind Puri to provide protection to the petitioner and his family and take necessary actions for the well being of the petitioner and his family under the supervision of this Hon'ble Court.

    d. Issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to the respondents to demolish the illegal construction and encroached area and forthwith stop the illegal construction/encroachment in the protected area of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top