SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Gurmeet Singh Sethi – Appellant
Versus
Harsharan Kaur Batra – Respondent


Table of Content
1. judgment challenged on jurisdictional grounds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments on jurisdiction and procedural requirements. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's observations on jurisdiction and implications. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 16 , 17)
4. decrees not automatically null from territorial jurisdiction. (Para 14)
5. order to improve jurisdiction clarity in courts. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)--This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking setting aside of the judgment and order dated 06.07.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-03, North District in Suit, being CS No. 2014 of 2016 titled Harsharan Kaur Batra v. Gurmeet Singh Sethi, on the ground of it having been passed by a Court which had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the Suit.

2. The above referred Suit was partially decreed by the learned Trial Court exercising power under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as `the Code).

3. On the respondent filing an Execution Petition, being Ex. No. 64 of 2020, the learned Trial Court noticed that the suit property in fact fell within the jurisdiction of North-West District and t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top