Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Subhash Malik – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disciplinary proceedings context. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. reasoning of the disciplinary authority. (Para 6) |
| 3. jurisdiction of the high court. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. comments by cat affecting promotions. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. final order regarding adverse comments. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER
CM APPL. 12733/2021 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per the extant rules.
2. The application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 4187/2021
3. The petition impugns the order dated 4th January, 2021 of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, of dismissal of OA No. 2214/2020 preferred by the petitioner, an Inspector in the respondents Delhi Police, against the punishment of `censure' meted out to him in disciplinary proceedings and confirmed in the departmental appeal preferred by the petitioner.
4. The said disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner and two others were initiated in pursuance to certain observations in an order in a Habeas Corpus petition preferred in this Court. This Court, while disposing of the Habeas Corpus petition observed that there was lack of diligence on the part of officials concerned.
5. It is the case of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
