Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Civil Audit Association, Category-I (Sr. Audit Officers and Audit Officers) – Appellant
Versus
Comptroller and Auditor General of I – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. impugning order from cat regarding pay fixation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. principles of delay in service-related claims. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 3. procedure for condonation of delay in cat. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. equality in treatment for similarly situated employees. (Para 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. cat to decide o.a. on merits. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER
CM No. 13055/2021 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant rules.
2. The application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 4294/2021
3. The petition impugns the order dated 5th January, 2021, of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, of dismissal of M.A. No. 570/2020 for condonation of 773 days delay in filing of O.A. No. 29/2021.
4. The counsel for the respondents appears on advance notice and has been heard.
5. The O.A. aforesaid was preferred, impugning the order dated 13th June, 2011 qua pay fixation. The counsel for the petitioners states that besides the said order, certain other orders/communications of the year 2011 were also impugned. CAT, vide the impugned order, has dismissed M.A. No. 570/2020 and consequently dismissed the O.A.
6. Since CAT, in the impugned order has recorded that the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
