Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Dinesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Bhushan Pandey – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of contempt case and promotion eligibility (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on validity of cat's contempt order (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. legal reasoning on promotions in light of pending proceedings (Para 10 , 17 , 22) |
| 4. court's analysis on disciplinary actions and promotions (Para 12 , 21) |
| 5. final dismissal of the case (Para 26) |
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
CM Nos.8594/2021, 8595/2021 (both for exemption) & 8596/2021 (for permission to file lengthy list of dates)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant rules.
2. The applications are disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.2852/2021 & CM No.8597/2021 (for filing additional documents)
3. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, impugns the order dated 25th January, 2021 of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, of closing the contempt case being C.P. No.422/2016 filed by the petitioner, averring non-compliance by the respondents of the order dated 12th May, 2016 in OA No.3604/2015 filed by the petitioner.
4. We have heard the counsel for the petitioner.
5. OA No.3604/2015 was filed by the petitioner, an Officer of the Indian Revenue
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
