Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools vs Directorate of Education

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
JAYANT NATH
Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Education – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petition seeks to challenge fee collection restrictions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. respondent issues orders restricting fees during lockdown. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
3. clarification of annual charges and development fees details. (Para 9 , 10)
4. argument against limitation of fee collection rights. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. rationale for imposing restrictions highlighted. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. discussion on powers of directorate of education. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
7. legal authority of doe to regulate fees detailed. (Para 23 , 24 , 28 , 29)
8. need for schools to maintain fee structures. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
9. court quashes the illegal orders regarding fee collection. (Para 51 , 54)

JUDGMENT

Jayant Nath, J. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking an appropriate writ/writ of certiorari to quash the orders dated 18.04.2020 and 28.08.2020 passed by the respondent in so far as it prevents private unaided recognized schools/members of the petitioner association from collecting a part of the fees i.e. Annual Charges and Development Fees even beyond the Lockdown period and deferring it till physical opening of the schools.

2. The petitioner is said to be a registered associ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTJAYANT NATHAction Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools – AppellantVersusDirectorate of Education – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
JAYANT NATH
Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Education – Respondent