SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Ghanshyam Das Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-27, Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

2. Present writ petitions have been filed challenging the assessment orders under Section 153A and 143(3) of the INCOME TAX ACT 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act'), notices of demand issued under Section 156 of the Act and notices of penalty issued under Section 274 read with Section 271 (1)(c) dated 09th June, 2021 and 10th June, 2021 for the Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned assessment orders have been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice and without affording an effective hearing to the petitioner.

4. He further states that the petitioner was entitled to be heard before passing the impugned assessment orders. He contends that the petitioner was under the belief that the date for filing the response to the notice dated 21st April, 2021 was extended indefinitely by a communication sent by the Income Tax Department vide email dated 21st April, 2021 at 6.01 P.M. which did not specify any date for the extension granted, owing to the lockdown imposed in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top