Arushi Suneja vs High Court of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Arushi Suneja – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Delhi – Respondent

Table of Content
1. challenge to order regarding employee confirmation. (Para 2 , 3)
2. petitioner cites precedent for deemed confirmation. (Para 4 , 6)
3. court analyzes prior judgments on probation and confirmation. (Para 5 , 7 , 8)
4. clarification on rules of confirmation and service tenure. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. petition dismissed; no merits found. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)--The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Order dated 26.11.2020 and the Memorandum dated 18.06.2021 passed by the respondent and further praying for a direction to the respondent to give to the petitioner two years lien against the post of Personal Assistant by treating her as a confirmed employee.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was appointed to the post of Personal Assistant vide Office Memorandum dated 07.06.2017 by the respondent. The Office Memorandum stated that the petitioner shall be placed on probation initially for a period of two years with a stipulation that expiry of the period of probation shall not result in the automatic confirmation of the petitioner to the said p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLAArushi Suneja – AppellantVersusHigh Court of Delhi – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Arushi Suneja – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Delhi – Respondent