SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, C. Hari Shankar, JJ.
Polytech Trade Foundation - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 3029 of 2020 and CM 10998 of 2020, 11044 of 2020, 11045 of 2020, 11046 of 2020, 11047 of 2020, 12389 of 2020, 18969 of 2020 and 18970 of 2020, W.P.(C) 10142 of 2020, W.P.(C) 3171 of 2020 and CM Appl. 11027 of 2020, W.P.(C) 3195 of 2020 and CM Appl
Decided On : 10-08-2021




Governmental directives cannot impede the contractual rights of private entities concerning detention and demurrage charges during lockdown, as per established legal and regulatory frameworks.

Headnote:(A) Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 7 and 8 - Disaster Management Act, 2005 - Judicial review in economic policy - Container Freight Stations (CFSs) not considered as customs stations despite being declared customs areas - Charges levied by CFSs for ground rent and detention during lockdown not actionable by government directives - Writ petitions dismissed against lack of jurisdiction and claim - No individual rights of importers over CFSs in pandemic context - Regulatory powers permit limited directive scope, but not unilateral waivers for private contracts. (Paras 37.7, 38.4, 39.4, 40.1)

JUDGMENT

C. Hari Shankar, J. Between the time when imported goods land on Indian soil, and the Customs authorities release them from their charge so that they become part of the "commercial land mass" of the country, they suffer various financial exactions, statutory as well as contractual. It is not necessary for us, in these petitions, to enter into the intricacies of the procedures followed before the applicable duties or taxes are paid and the goods, are released by the Customs. We are concerned with the amount which the importers (or exporters, in the case of export goods) pay, during this period, to the shipping lines, Inland Container Depots (ICDs) and/or Container Freight Stations (CFSs). ICDs and CFSs are Customs Cargo Service Providers, who permit storage of imported goods, prior to their being released by the Customs after payment of duty, against pre-fixed and pre-determined charges. These charges involve various elements with which, too, we need not concern ourselves. The petitioners in these petitions are concerned with the penal charges levied by ICDs/CFSs, for the period, beyond a certain number of "free days", during which the goods continue to remain in their premises, and levied by shipping lines, in the event the containers are not returned to them within a fixed number of "free days". Ordinarily, therefore, after containers are unloaded from the vessel in which they arrive, the containers are required to be returned to the shipping lines within a contractually stipulated number of days. If they are so returned, no additional charge is levied on the importer. If they are not returned to the shipping lines within such "free days", they suffer detention charges, levied by the shipping lines in accordance with the contract executed between the shipping lines and the importers. Similarly, ICDs and CFSs also permit the imported goods to be stored within their premises for a number of "free days", on payment of normal charges. If the goods remain in their premises beyond such "free days", they suffer penal charges, chiefly ground rent at much higher rates than is ordinarily charged.

2. The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC; now rechristened "CBIC") issued, on 22nd December, 1995, a Circular, simplifying the procedure for setting up ICDs and CFSs. We may reproduce paras 2 and 3 of the said Circular:

    "2. The Container Freight Station (CFS) is not a Customs Station but it is to be declared as a Customs area under Section 8 of the CUSTOMS ACT 1 by the Commissioners of Customs concerned. Normally, every CFS is located in a Customs Station or in an adjunct to a Customs station. CFS may handle exclusively export cargo or import cargo or both. Generally, CFS is taken to be an extended arm of the Port/ICD/ACC. Depending upon its importance and volume of work it handles, it functions like a full-fledged Customs Station wherein the admission, processing and completion of all customs procedures are done. Alternatively, the processing of the Customs clearance documents is done in the Customs House and the CFS functions like `Docks' where the examination and sealing of export cargo or examination and customs clearance of import cargo is done. Thus, depending upon the location, workload and other related factors, Commissioners of Customs can devise the Customs work in such CFS.

    3. Commissioners of Customs are authorised to notify a CFS as a Customs area under Section 8 of the CUSTOMS ACT in any place declared by the Central Government as a Customs station under Section 7 of the CUSTOMS ACT 2

    *****

    However, before declaring a CFS, the Commissioners may assess the requirements of such facility in each Port/ICD/ACC for creation of such additional Customs area (CFS). If need be, the Commissioners may discuss such feasibility in the Regional Advisory Committee meetings or meetings with the Trade. Commissioners are advised, however before notifying any new CFS as Customs area in a Customs Station, they should call for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top