DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Ambience Projects & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Bindal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the arbitration dispute. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding non-arbitrability. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's analysis on jurisdiction. (Para 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court confirms arbitrator's jurisdiction. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. conclusion that petition is not maintainable. (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)
C.M. No.25855/2021 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant Rules.
2. The application is disposed of.
CM(M) 525/2021 & CM No.25854/2021 (for stay)
3. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed impugning the order dated 23rd June, 2021 passed by the Ms. Bimla Makin, District Judge (Retd.), Sole Arbitrator, whereby the application dated 15th March, 2021 filed by the petitioner for quashing of arbitration proceedings on account of there being no arbitrable dispute and for holding that the Arbitrator has no jurisdiction to deal with the dispute between the parties, was dismissed.
4. The brief facts giving rise to the present petition are set out hereinafter. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was executed between the petitioner and the respondent o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.