DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Kulan Rukhsana Amin – Appellant
Versus
Gaurang Kanth – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)
I.A. 9939/2021 (under Section 151 of CPC for delay in filing the reply to the application filed by the Plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC)
1. For the grounds and reasons stated therein, the delay in filing the reply is condoned.
2. The application is disposed of.
I.A. 7770/2021 (under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for amendment of the plaint)
3. Mr. S.S. Jauhar, counsel for the Applicant/Plaintiffs states that he has instructions not to press this application.
4. The application is dismissed as not pressed.
I.A. 7771/2021 (under Order 1 Rule 10 r/w Section 151 of CPC for adding the new purchasers of the suit property as party Defendants), & I.A. 7769/2021 (under Order 22 Rule 10 r/w/ Section 151 of CPC for substitution of Defendants No. 1 and 2 and impleadment of Applicants in place of the Defendants No. 1 and 2)
5. The present suit has been filed for declaration, possession, and permanent injunction against Defendants No. 1 and 2 in respect of property bearing No. 268, measuring 360 sq. yds. out of Khasra No. 138, situated in the revenue estate of Village Okhla, abadi known
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.