Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Nadir @ Shah Alam – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for regular bail. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. state's argument against bail. (Para 3) |
| 3. details of fir and eyewitness statements. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. evidence of conspiracy and connection to murder. (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's reasoning for denying bail. (Para 13) |
| 6. final order and dismissal of petition. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
Mukta Gupta, J. By this petition, petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.247/2020 under Sections 302 /392/397/120B/34 IPC and Sections 25 /27 ARMS ACT registered at PS Mandawali, Delhi.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was arrested in the above-noted FIR on 14th June, 2020 and from that day he is in custody. There is no legally admissible evidence against the petitioner with the prosecution in the charge-sheet filed against the petitioner. No recovery has been made from the petitioner except for his own mobile phone which has no connection with the commission of the alleged offence. In the entire charge-sheet no motive has been attributed to the petitioner and the petitioner is in no manner connected with the commission of the alleged offence. The allegation that the petitioner did recce of the area
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
