Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Pilaka Naga Swaroop – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims similar relief as previous cases. (Para 1) |
| 2. no objection certificate provided by petitioner. (Para 2) |
| 3. respondents agree to verify and possibly concede relief. (Para 3) |
| 4. directions given to grant pension based on verification. (Para 4) |
| 5. interest on unpaid pension after twelve weeks. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) had been given.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
