SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Azad Singh @ Mamu - Appellant
Versus
State (N.C.T of Delhi) - Respondent
Bail Appln. 3140 of 2021
Decided On : 14-09-2021




Court denied anticipatory bail due to severity of injuries, criminal history, and risk of fleeing justice, emphasizing necessary custody for investigation.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 438 - Anticipatory bail - The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, which was denied due to the nature of the offences, including grievous injuries inflicted and the petitioner's status as a Bad Character with multiple pending cases - The court emphasized that the parameters for granting anticipatory bail include the gravity of the accusation, antecedents of the applicant, and likelihood of flight or tampering - Factors taken into account included a jaw fracture suffered by the complainant and the petitioner's absconding history - The petitioner was considered a potential threat to the complainant and witnesses. (Paras 10 and 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was implicated in an incident on 07.09.2020, leading to grievous injuries to the complainant, who was threatened and attacked with a knife. An FIR was registered on 09.09.2020 after the complainant's medical treatment was recorded.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner is a Bad Character, has multiple cases against him, and there exists a reasonable apprehension that he may abscond if granted anticipatory bail. Due to the severity of the injuries and prior conduct, custodial interrogation is necessary.

Issues: Whether to grant anticipatory bail considering the petitioner's character, the injurious incident, and the possibility of influencing witnesses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court confirmed that custodial interrogation was necessary given the circumstances, especially the petitioner's criminal history and the nature of the crime, thereby justifying the denial of bail.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background leading to bail application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of prior bail applications and procedural history. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments against granting anticipatory bail based on the petitioner's record. (Para 5)
4. court observations on the severity of injuries and petitioner's behavior. (Para 6 , 7)
5. legal principles guiding anticipatory bail decisions. (Para 8 , 9)
6. court's reasoning against granting anticipatory bail. (Para 10 , 11)
7. final ruling on the bail application. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. This petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C is for grant of bail to the petitioner in the event of arrest in FIR No.541/2020 dated 09.09.2020, registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar East for offences under Sections 308 /324/392/506 IPC.

2. Facts, in brief, leading to the present petition are as under:

a) An information was received on 08.09.2020 that "D-9 Peeragarhi Apsra Banquet Hall, Caller ke pati ko Mamu Naam Ke Badmash Ne Chaku Mar Diya". The said information was entered vide DD No.05-A. The police reached the spot and found that the injured has been shifted to Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Mangolpuri. Police reached the Hospital and collected the MLC of the injured, being MLC No.10893/2020. The MLC records the following injuries:

i. Abrasion on left parietal region,

ii. Swelling on B/L cheek,

iii. Clear incised wound on Left thigh 2cm x 0.5cm x0.2cm,

iv. Clear incised wound on right thigh 1cm x 0.2cm x0.2cm.

b) The MLC also records that the injured was not able to speak due to pain and swelling in his jaws. It is stated that on the next day i.e. 09.09.2020, the Police reached the house of the injured and recorded his statement.

c) It was stated by the complainant that on 07.09.2020, at about 11:30 PM, when he was going to Kapoor Dhaba to take food, when he reached near Hanuman Temple, the petitioner herein, who is a Bad Character of the area and against whom a number of cases are registered, confronted the complainant and threatened him by saying that the complainant's brother, Dheeraj, is behaving like a strongman of the area and today the petitioner will teach him a lesson. It is stated that the petitioner took out a knife and inflicted injuries on the legs of the complainant due to which he fell down. It is stated that the petitioner then sat over the complainant and hit him on his face a number of times with the butt of knife. It is stated that the petitioner then took away the complainant's mobile phone. It is stated that the petitioner had abused the complainant's brother some days back but since the petitioner is a Bad Characer of the area, the complainant's brother was hesitant to file any complaint. It is stated that on receiving the information about the incident the complainant's brother and his wife reached the spot and his wife called the police. It is stated that the brother of the complainant took him to the Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital. It is stated the complainant was released from the Hospital but since there was intense pain in his jaws and he was not able to speak and he did not gave any statement to the Police on that day. It is stated that since the Police had come to the house of the petitioner, he is giving the present statement. On the statement of the injured/complainant, FIR No.541/2020 dated 09.09.2020, was registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar East for offences under Sections 308 /324/392/506 IPC.

d) The petitioner filed an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C seeking anticipatory bail. The learned Additional Session Judge - 03, Tis Hazari Courts, vide order dated 28.09.2020, dismissed the said application.

e) The petitioner filed another application under Section 438 Cr.P.C seeking anticipatory bail. The learned Additional Session Judge - 01, Tis Hazari Courts, vide order dated 29.06.2021, dismissed the said application.

f) The petitioner has thereafter approached this Court by filing the instant bail application.

3. Notice was is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top