SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Azad Singh @ Mamu – Appellant
Versus
State (N.C.T of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background leading to bail application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of prior bail applications and procedural history. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments against granting anticipatory bail based on the petitioner's record. (Para 5)
4. court observations on the severity of injuries and petitioner's behavior. (Para 6 , 7)
5. legal principles guiding anticipatory bail decisions. (Para 8 , 9)
6. court's reasoning against granting anticipatory bail. (Para 10 , 11)
7. final ruling on the bail application. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. This petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C is for grant of bail to the petitioner in the event of arrest in FIR No.541/2020 dated 09.09.2020, registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar East for offences under Sections 308 /324/392/506 IPC.

2. Facts, in brief, leading to the present petition are as under:

a) An information was received on 08.09.2020 that "D-9 Peeragarhi Apsra Banquet Hall, Caller ke pati ko Mamu Naam Ke Badmash Ne Chaku Mar Diya". The said information was entered vide DD No.05-A. The police reached the spot and found that the injured has been shifted to Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Mangolpuri. Police reached the Hospital

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top