SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Urmila Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Jai Bhagwan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)

I.A. 14704/2019 (under Order XII Rule 6 CPC for decree of possession)

1. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking partition of the estate of her father Late Shri Ramesh Chandra Kaushik being:

a) Property bearing Khasra No. 204, measuring approximately 352 sq. yards, Main Market Kondali, Delhi-110096,

b) Property bearing Khasra No. 186-187, measuring approximately 1100-1200 sq. yards Village Kondali, Delhi-110096 (together referred to as the "suit properties")

2. The case of the Plaintiff is that her father died intestate and is survived by Class 1 legal heirs being his sons and daughters, who are parties to the present suit. Defendant Nos. 1 to 5 referred to as "Contesting Defendants" are contesting the suit and whereas Defendant No. 6 supports the Plaintiff's prayer for partition.

3. By way of the instant application, Plaintiff seeks judgment on admission on the basis of averments made in the written statement filed by Defendant Nos. 1 to 5.

Plaintiff's contentions

4. Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, counsel for the Plaintiff makes the following submissions:

4.1. The averments made in the written statement filed by the Contesting Defend








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top