Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Priyanshu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to framing of charge under ipc. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. demand for ransom and implications for the child's safety. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. ingredients of section 364a ipc and the definition of hurt. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. rejection of defence arguments and confirmation of charges. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's order and dismissal of petition. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Mukta Gupta, j. (ORAL)--The hearing has been conducted through Physical Mode.
CRL.M.A. 16535/2021 (Exemption)
1.1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
1.2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.REV.P. 329/2021
2.1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 18th September, 2021 passed by the learned ASJ directing framing of charge for offences punishable under Section 364A IPC against the petitioner.
2.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was in very good relationship with the victim family and usually took the child to play with him. The demand of money, even as per the Whatsapp chat does not relate to the victim and even in the alleged demands, the petitioner repeatedly stated that he will send the child. Thus, the amount demanded cannot be treated as a ransom and fur
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
