SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Vibhor Jain – Appellant
Versus
Ekibom Technology India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. dispute arises from service contract (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. modification of impugned order to allow arbitration (Para 6 , 13)
3. arguments regarding arbitration applicability (Para 7 , 8)
4. court's opinion on group of companies doctrine (Para 11 , 12)
5. conclusion and further directives (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present revision petitions arise out of the impugned order dated 25th November, 2019 passed by the Ld. ADJ, South West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi (hereinafter "Trial Court") in Civil Suit No. CS (Comm) 22/2019 titled Vibhor Jain v. Beijing Mobike Technology Co. Ltd. & Ors.. By the impugned order, the application filed by the Respondent No.1/Defendant No.3 under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter "Act") has been allowed by the Trial Court, and accordingly, the commercial suit for declaration and damages as consequential relief has been disposed of.

3. The dispute in the present case arose out of a suit instituted by the Petitioners against three companies, namely Beijing Mobike Technology Co. Ltd., Ekibom Technology India Pvt. Lt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top