SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
ATE Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Suresh S.G. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. confidentiality breaches and proprietary information (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
2. defendants argue differences in designs (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
3. granting of ad interim injunction (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. procedural directions for case progression (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)

ORDER

The hearing has been conducted through Video Conferencing.

I.A.9921/2020 (exemption)

1.1 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

1.2 Original documents, if any, be filed within two weeks of the resumption of the normal Court functioning.

1.3 Application is disposed of.

CS(COMM) 482/2020 I.A.9920/2020 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC)

2. Plaint be registered as a suit.

Issue summons in the suit and notice in the application to the defendants.

3. Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate accepts summons in the suit and notice in the application on behalf of defendant Nos.1 to 6.

4. Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, learned Standing Counsel accepts summons in the suit and notice in the application on behalf of defendant No.8.

5. Defendant No.7 has been impleaded as proforma defendant as the only relief claimed against defendant No.7 being that they would not proceed wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top