SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation - Appellant
Versus
Spartan Engineering Industries Private Limited - Respondent
CS(COMM) 34 of 2021 & I.A. 1042 of 2021, I.A. 1043 of 2021 and I.A. 1044 of 2021
Decided On : 28-01-2021




Unauthorized use of software constitutes copyright infringement, warranting injunctive relief to protect intellectual property rights under the Copyright Act.

Headnote:(A) Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 40, 51(a)(i), 14, 17, 63B, 65A - Software infringement - Plaintiffs allege unauthorized use of pirated copies of 'SOLIDWORKS' software by the defendants for business purposes. Ad interim ex-parte injunction granted restraining defendants from using pirated software pending adjudication. (Paras 4.3, 21, 24)

(B) Injunctions - The court emphasized the serious nature of software infringement and the necessity to protect copyright owners against such unlawful acts. Proper enforcement of EULAs is essential in providing copyright protection. (Paras 22, 23)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiffs accused the defendants of using pirated 'SOLIDWORKS' software on multiple computer systems, leading to significant unauthorized usage detected by an infringement database. (Paras 17-19)

Findings of Court:
A strong case for unauthorized copyright infringement was established, warranting an interim injunction to prevent further violations while the case is pending. (Paras 21-23)

Issues: The primary issue was whether the plaintiffs successfully demonstrated unauthorized use of their copyrighted software justifying the grant of an ad interim injunction. (Paras 21, 24)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence of infringement and the serious consequences of software piracy justified the urgency for an injunction to protect their intellectual property rights. (Paras 22-24)

Result: Ad interim ex-parte injunction granted against the defendants.

Table of Content
1. copyright ownership and protection details (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. details of copyright infringement and classification (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. infringement detection and plaintiff's claims (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. court's analysis on injunction request (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
5. issuance of ad interim injunction (Para 25 , 26 , 27)

ORDER

(Video-Conferencing)

I.A. 1044/2021 (under Order XI Rule 1(4) CPC) in CS(COMM) 34/2021

1.1 Subject to the plaintiffs' filing clear copies of documents which may be dim, on which the plaintiffs seek to place reliance, within a period of four weeks from today, exemption is allowed for the present.

1.2 The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 1043/2021 in CS (COMM) 34/2021

2.1 The plaintiffs are granted permission to file additional documents, if they so choose, within a period of four weeks from today subject to the rights of defendants to admit or deny the said documents.

2.2 The application stands disposed of.

CS(COMM) 34/2021

3.1. Issue summons.

3.2. Written statement, if any, be filed within a period of four weeks accompanied by affidavit of admission/denial of documents filed by plaintiffs. Replication thereto, if any, be filed within a period of two weeks thereof accompanied by affidavit of admission/denial of documents filed by defendants.

3.3. List before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) for admission/denial of documents and marking of exhibits on 23rd March, 2021.

I.A. 1042/2021 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC) in CS (COMM) 34/2021

4.1. Issue notice, returnable on 26th April, 2021.

4.2. Response to this application, if any, be filed within a period of four weeks with advance copy to learned counsel for the plaintiffs, who may file rejoinder thereto, if any, within two weeks thereof.

4.3. The plaintiffs essentially seek injunction against the defendants directly or indirectly using, copying or otherwise dealing with pirated/unlicensed copies of the "SOLIDWORKS" software programme, in which the plaintiffs claim copyright, or its versions or any other software programmes developed by the plaintiffs which may infringe the copyright of Plaintiff No. 1. Plaintiff no. 2 is a sister concern of M/s Dassault Systemes France and claims to have been established by the aforesaid French company to manage all its affairs with respect to the "SOLIDWORKS" software in India. Plaintiff No. 1 is stated to be carrying on business in India through Plaintiff No. 2.

4.4. The "SOLIDWORKS" software is a computer aided design (CAD) software, aimed at modelling and simulating three dimensional (3D) solid products and is stated to cater to the aerospace, defence, automotive, transportation, consumer products and educational industries amongst others.

5. The "SOLIDWORKS" software programme is in the nature of a compact CAD and computer aided engineering (CAE) software which facilitates development of products in a 3D environment.

6. The software programme of the plaintiff, as well as the instruction manuals relating thereto are, in the submission of plaintiffs, "literary work" entitled to copyright protection. It is stated that these software programmes were developed by the employees of the plaintiffs for use by the plaintiffs and that, by application of the "work for hire" doctrine, the copyright therein belongs to the plaintiffs, as the employer of the employees who had developed the software.

7. Plaintiff No. 1 is, therefore, according to the plaint, the copyright owner in the software programmes which are "works", within the meaning of the COPYRIGHT ACT , 1957.

8. The software programme in issue was, it is submitted, first published in the United States of America. The plaint further avers that India and the United States are members of the Berne Convention, Universal Copyright Convention and the World Trade Organisation Agreement (WTO), which provide for protection of copyright, in India, for works which were first published in United States, as thoug

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top