IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation - Appellant
Versus
Spartan Engineering Industries Private Limited - Respondent
CS(COMM) 34 of 2021 & I.A. 1042 of 2021, I.A. 1043 of 2021 and I.A. 1044 of 2021
Decided On : 28-01-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. copyright ownership and protection details (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. details of copyright infringement and classification (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. infringement detection and plaintiff's claims (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. court's analysis on injunction request (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. issuance of ad interim injunction (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
ORDER
(Video-Conferencing)
I.A. 1044/2021 (under Order XI Rule 1(4) CPC) in CS(COMM) 34/2021
1.1 Subject to the plaintiffs' filing clear copies of documents which may be dim, on which the plaintiffs seek to place reliance, within a period of four weeks from today, exemption is allowed for the present.
1.2 The application stands disposed of.
I.A. 1043/2021 in CS (COMM) 34/2021
2.1 The plaintiffs are granted permission to file additional documents, if they so choose, within a period of four weeks from today subject to the rights of defendants to admit or deny the said documents.
2.2 The application stands disposed of.
CS(COMM) 34/2021
3.1. Issue summons.
3.2. Written statement, if any, be filed within a period of four weeks accompanied by affidavit of admission/denial of documents filed by plaintiffs. Replication thereto, if any, be filed within a period of two weeks thereof accompanied by affidavit of admission/denial of documents filed by defendants.
3.3. List before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) for admission/denial of documents and marking of exhibits on 23rd March, 2021.
I.A. 1042/2021 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC) in CS (COMM) 34/2021
4.1. Issue notice, returnable on 26th April, 2021.
4.2. Response to this application, if any, be filed within a period of four weeks with advance copy to learned counsel for the plaintiffs, who may file rejoinder thereto, if any, within two weeks thereof.
4.3. The plaintiffs essentially seek injunction against the defendants directly or indirectly using, copying or otherwise dealing with pirated/unlicensed copies of the "SOLIDWORKS" software programme, in which the plaintiffs claim copyright, or its versions or any other software programmes developed by the plaintiffs which may infringe the copyright of Plaintiff No. 1. Plaintiff no. 2 is a sister concern of M/s Dassault Systemes France and claims to have been established by the aforesaid French company to manage all its affairs with respect to the "SOLIDWORKS" software in India. Plaintiff No. 1 is stated to be carrying on business in India through Plaintiff No. 2.
4.4. The "SOLIDWORKS" software is a computer aided design (CAD) software, aimed at modelling and simulating three dimensional (3D) solid products and is stated to cater to the aerospace, defence, automotive, transportation, consumer products and educational industries amongst others.
5. The "SOLIDWORKS" software programme is in the nature of a compact CAD and computer aided engineering (CAE) software which facilitates development of products in a 3D environment.
6. The software programme of the plaintiff, as well as the instruction manuals relating thereto are, in the submission of plaintiffs, "literary work" entitled to copyright protection. It is stated that these software programmes were developed by the employees of the plaintiffs for use by the plaintiffs and that, by application of the "work for hire" doctrine, the copyright therein belongs to the plaintiffs, as the employer of the employees who had developed the software.
7. Plaintiff No. 1 is, therefore, according to the plaint, the copyright owner in the software programmes which are "works", within the meaning of the COPYRIGHT ACT , 1957.
8. The software programme in issue was, it is submitted, first published in the United States of America. The plaint further avers that India and the United States are members of the Berne Convention, Universal Copyright Convention and the World Trade Organisation Agreement (WTO), which provide for protection of copyright, in India, for works which were first published in United States, as thoug
Court ruled that unauthorized software use constitutes copyright infringement and emphasized the necessity of valid licenses for software usage.
Unauthorized use of copyrighted software constitutes infringement under the Copyright Act, allowing for injunctive relief and damages.
Copyright infringement in software programmes under the Copyright Act, 1957, leading to remedies including permanent injunction, delivery up of unlicensed software, and damages.
A derivative work is entitled to its own copyright protection.
The court ruled that jurisdiction objections must be accepted based on the plaint's claims, enabling a foreign entity's operational presence via a local subsidiary to maintain a suit under the Copyri....
The court established that unauthorized distribution of cinematograph films constitutes copyright infringement, allowing for dynamic injunctions to protect against evolving infringement tactics.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.