DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Ved Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Aashi Tanwar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 2nd March, 2021 passed by the Ld. ADJ, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter "Trial Court") in C.S. No.503/2020 titled "Aashi Tanwar v. Ved Prakash & Ors." By the impugned order, the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed by the Petitioner, who was Defendant No.1 in the suit, has been dismissed by the Trial Court.
3. The suit was filed by Respondent Nos.1 & 2 who were the Plaintiffs seeking partition, possession and permanent injunction, in respect of property numbers WZ-375 Basai Darapur, Shivaji Marg, New Delhi measuring 250 sq. approx. and WZ-258, Basai Darapur, Shivaji Marg, New Delhi measuring 50 sq. yards (hereinafter "suit properties"). The claim of the Plaintiff is one-fourth of the share of the deceased- Sh. Ramesh Tanwar, also known as Sh. Ram Niwas. (hereinafter "Ram Niwas")
4. The case of the Petitioner in the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is that the suit properties had been purchased way by the Petitioner from Sh. Ram Niwas way back in 2001. The plaint itself admits that the partition had taken p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.