Mohd. Haris Usmani vs State (N.C.T of Delhi)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Mohd. Haris Usmani – Appellant
Versus
State (N.C.T of Delhi) – Respondent

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding non-application of mind (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's observations on legal requirements (Para 6 , 10 , 12 , 19)
4. ratio decidendi on issuing proclamations (Para 8 , 9 , 16 , 21 , 22)
5. final conclusions on quashing the order (Para 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. By way of the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 08.07.2020 passed by the learned Duty M.M. (South-East District), Saket Courts, New Delhi as well as the orders dated 03.08.2021 and 06.08.2021 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-06 (South-East District), Saket Courts, New Delhi in case arising out of FIR No. 601/2019 registered under Sections 376 /506/406/323/313/34 IPC at Police Station Kalkaji, New Delhi, whereby the petitioner has been declared an Absconder.

2. Brief facts, necessary for deciding the present petition, are that the aforesaid FIR came to be registered on 04.12.2019. During the pendency of investigation, the Investigating Officer of the case obtained NBWs against the petitioner on 09.01.2020. Thereafter, the Investigating Officer also moved an ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMANOJ KUMAR OHRIMohd. Haris Usmani – AppellantVersusState (N.C.T of Delhi) – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Mohd. Haris Usmani – Appellant
Versus
State (N.C.T of Delhi) – Respondent