Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Rajesh Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Tata Teleservices Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes prompting arbitration (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. mediation was unsuccessful (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments for and against arbitration (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. consent to arbitration acknowledged (Para 7) |
| 5. appointment and fees of arbitrator (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. petition disposed of (Para 11) |
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of Arbitrator on terms mentioned in Clause-28 of the Business Partnership Agreement dated 18.04.2016 executed with respondents.
2. Petitioner claims to be proprietor of M/s Edge Technologies, is in the field of marketing of services and associated with the respondent-Tata Teleservices Ltd. for marketing its services & products on commission basis since the year 2009. Based upon business, an agreement dated 20.09.2012 was entered between petitioner and Tata Teleservices Ltd. which was further renewed on 18.04.2016. However, certain disputes arose between the parties with regard to some incentive programme in the year 2014-2015 and in respect thereof, petitioner had preferred a commercial suit bearing No. 39/2021. Thereafter, certain disput
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
