SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Hari Ram – Appellant
Versus
Lekhi Ram – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application for amendment in plaint allowed. (Para 2 , 3)
2. prior admissions affect amendment petition. (Para 4 , 5)
3. trial court's discretion in amendment matters. (Para 6 , 7)
4. defendant retains rights to contest amendments. (Para 8 , 9)
5. order to conclude the petition with directives. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done in physical Court. Hybrid mode is permitted in cases where permission is being sought from the Court.

CM APPL. 44542/2021 (for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

CRP 94/2021 & CM APPL. 44541/2021 (for stay)

3. The Petitioner/Defendant (hereinafter "Defendant") assails the order dated 9th September, 2021, passed by the ADJ, South West Dwarka, New Delhi (hereinafter "Trial Court") in CS No. 10291/2016 titled Lekhi Ram v. Hari Ram. Vide the said order, an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment in the original plaint filed by the Plaintiff/Respondent (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), has been allowed by the Trial Court, subject to cost of Rs. 20,000/-to be deposited by the Plaintiff. The observations of the Trial Court are as under:

    "1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top