SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Qamar Hasnain – Appellant
Versus
Syed Waseem Rizvi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[VIA HYBRID MODE]

SAnjeev Narula, J. (Oral)

1. Aggrieved with an online self-publication titled "Muhammad", purportedly authored by Defendant No.1, Plaintiff has approached this Court seeking orders restraining Defendant No. 1 from making derogatory, demeaning and incendiary statements against the religion of Islam, the Holy Qur'an and Prophet Mohammed and other revered personages. The suit contains following prayers:

    "a) Pass a decree for permanent and mandatory injunction against the Defendant No. 1, thereby restraining the Defendant No. 1 from making statements and/or publishing remarks that are lascivious, prurient derogatory and hurtful, against the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), the religion of Islam, its followers, its tenets and/or against the Holy Qur'an;

    b) Pass a decree for permanent and mandatory injunction against the Defendant No. 1, thereby restraining the Defendant No. 1 from selling, letting to hire, distributing, publicly exhibiting, or in any manner putting into circulation for the purpose of sale, hire, distribution, public exhibition, circulation and/or promotion, copies of the book titled Muhammad in any way and through any medium, including but not limit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top