Utkarsh Rai vs Delhi Technological University

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Utkarsh Rai – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Technological University – Respondent

Table of Content
1. candidate's entitlement to priority-iv based on father's military service. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments for inclusion in priority-iv with supporting documents. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. university's defense for maintaining priority-vi categorization. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. court's analysis of expert opinion and definitions in the admission brochure. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. distinction of legal precedents regarding disability pension vs. academic admission priorities. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
6. final dismissal of the petition with no changes to the priority categorization. (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)--The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

1. The petitioner was a candidate for admission to the respondent No.1- Delhi Technological University ["the University"] for the B.Tech course in the 2021-22 session. The petitioner applied in the Children and Wards of Defence Personnel category ["the CW category"]. His grievance is that he was denied admission because he was considered in Priority-VI in the CW category, instead of Priority- IV, to which he claimed entitlement. According to the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTPRATEEK JALANUtkarsh Rai – AppellantVersusDelhi Technological University – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Utkarsh Rai – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Technological University – Respondent