DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Utkarsh Rai – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Technological University – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)--The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
1. The petitioner was a candidate for admission to the respondent No.1- Delhi Technological University ["the University"] for the B.Tech course in the 2021-22 session. The petitioner applied in the Children and Wards of Defence Personnel category ["the CW category"]. His grievance is that he was denied admission because he was considered in Priority-VI in the CW category, instead of Priority- IV, to which he claimed entitlement. According to the petitioner, he would have been admitted to the University, if he had been considered in Priority-IV.
Facts
2. The University invited applications for the course in question by way of an Admission Brochure, which has been placed on record. It provides for a reservation of 5% of total seats for the CW category, and lays down various priorities within the CW category, in which candidates would be considered.
3. Priorities-IV and VI, with which we are concerned in this petition, read as follows:
"Priority IV - Wards of disabled in service and boarded/invalid out with disability attributable to military service. Required Certifi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.