Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JAYANT NATH
Alkem Laboratories Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. use and registration of trademark pan marks (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments about the commonality of trademark usage (Para 11 , 12) |
| 3. admissibility of trademark evidence (Para 13) |
| 4. public domain terminology in drug naming (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. prima facie protection of the pan marks (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. interim injunction granted against defendants (Para 20 , 21) |
| 7. conditions for existing stock sales (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
ORDER
IA Nos.13365-13367/2021(exemption)
1. Applications are allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CS(COMM) 506/2021
2. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.
3. Issue summons. Learned counsel for the defendants accepts notice.
4. Pleadings be completed within the statutory period.
IA No.13364/2021
5. This application is filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC seeking an ex-parte interim injunction to restrain the defendants, their directors etc. from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, exporting, advertising etc. any pharmaceutical or medicinal preparation or any such allied and cognate goods under the impugned marks `Doctor PAND'/' Doctor PAN'/'Dr.Pan' or any other mark identical and/or deceptively similar to th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
