Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Puja Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Pravesh Narula – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the suit and claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding cause of action and merit. (Para 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's reasoning on maintaining the suit. (Para 6 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. conclusion and dismissal of the petition. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the defendant before the learned Commercial Court, Central District, Tis Hazari, against its orders dated 15th December, 2021, dismissing the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed by the petitioner/defendant for rejection of the suit as there was no cause of action.
2. The respondent before this Court had filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain the petitioner/defendant from infringing the copyright of the respondent/plaintiff with further directions of delivery up, damages and rendition of accounts.
3. The respondent/plaintiff is the proprietor of M/s Capital Enterprises and claimed to be carrying on an old, established and reputed business of manufacturing and trading in socks etc. In his suit he claimed to have adopted the trade mark/logo `R.D. Special' 
in the 
Point of Law : Trial Court would be justified in putting an end to vexatious, frivolous, meaningless and sham litigation. But this power may be exercised only where the plaint clearly discloses no ca....
The main legal point established is that the suit can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (d) of CPC if it appears to be barred by any law, as per the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Each act of trademark infringement constitutes a fresh cause of action, allowing the aggrieved party to file a new suit for ongoing violations.
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is maintainable against non-appealable orders of Commercial Courts despite restrictions in the Commercial Courts Act, preserving the High Cou....
To establish trademark infringement, the plaint must demonstrate use 'in the course of trade'; mere display of a mark without commercial activity does not satisfy this requirement.
The court upheld the grant of a temporary injunction due to established copyright ownership and urgency in preventing further infringement, emphasizing the need for protection against irreparable har....
The court emphasized the importance of urgency in seeking interim relief, the authority of the plaintiff's representative to institute the suit, and the jurisdiction based on the provisions of the Tr....
Against an order dismissing an application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement, neither an appeal nor revision petition under Section 115 of the CPC lies.
The jurisdiction of the Commercial Court can be established through online businesses actively targeting customers within that jurisdiction, regardless of where the business is physically located.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
