Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Tepander Giri – Appellant
Versus
SHO – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. right to register fir and investigate complaints (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments against the necessity of fir registration (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. legal analysis regarding fir registration process (Para 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. exceptions allowing preliminary inquiry before fir (Para 19) |
| 5. dismissal of petition and direction on inquiry (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter "Cr.P.C.") has been filed by the Petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
"a. Direct the respondent no. 1 to conduct detail and thorough enquiry/investigation on the complaint dated 29-10-2020 of the petitioner (given through speed post dated 29.10.2020) and provide a copy of complete enquiry report to the petitioner in term of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case title "Lalita Kumari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh."
b. Direct the respondent no. 1 to register the FIR on the complaint dated 29.10.2020 of the petitioner for the offence under section 13 (1) (c) and (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act and under
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
