Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Devender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of fraudulent activity by yoyo cabs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. evidence of victimization and details of the fraud. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. ongoing investigation and evidentiary concerns. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. importance of balancing seriousness of charges with bail considerations. (Para 14 , 29) |
| 5. defendant's claims regarding implicating circumstances. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. contention that the charge sheet lacks concrete evidence against the applicant. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. citing prior judgments to support bail request. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. court's order granting bail with specific conditions. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. The applicant, vide the present application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 seeks the grant of regular bail in relation to FIR No.103/2021, PS EOW under Sections 420/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 submitting to the effect that he is incarcerated since 07.03.2021 and that he has no role whatsoever to play in the instant case and that there is no evidence that has been collected by the Investigating Agency even in the charge sheet that has been submitted.
2. As per the prosecution version put for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
