SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Power Links Transmission Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. filing of appeals against prior orders. (Para 1)
2. challenges on interest expenditure and precedent values. (Para 2 , 3)
3. previous decisions affecting current assessments. (Para 4)
4. principles of res judicata in taxation. (Para 5 , 6)
5. court’s emphasis on consistency in tax law. (Para 7)
6. final decision on the appeals with no legal question. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present appeals have been filed challenging the orders dated 02nd March, 2021 passed in ITA 5965/DEL/2017 and ITA 5966/DEL/2017 for the Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15 respectively.

2. Learned counsel for the Appellant-Revenue states that the ITAT has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.5,64,73,054/- made by the Assessing Officer under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act') on account of disallowance of interest expenditure. He states that the ITAT has failed to appreciate that the assessing company had used the borrowed funds for non-business purposes. He states that the Company earned interest income at an average rate of 7.6% while on loans the assessee company paid interest at an average rate of 12.1%. He contends that liabili

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top